Mar 28, 2016 - 520.5 Air and Vacuum Release Valve Assembly. Issued at the pre-construction conference (with the City Engineer or their. A CD shall also be submitted containing the AutoCAD and PDF. 2002 Revision. Prescribed herein for any utility work requiring such a permit and shall expire at the time. Dec 21, 2017 - After investigation I found out that ACI 2002, 2005, 2008, 2011 all implemented in RSA calculate it wrongly. Of RC-columns - resulting in an isotherm plot (that's one of the results). Forces in the cross section after cracking in the Ultimate Limit State. Other times, there's a shelf life to the old CEO.
Several years ago, I wanted to get into autocad again but not pay for the latest and greatest. It was just for my own personal use of playing around and designing things so I had no worries of format compatibilities with other companies, etc. I had gotten a stack of autocad lt 2002 books for free from a professor at the college I worked at, so I set out on ebay to find a copy.
Got one complete in box! When it arrived, I fired up the installer, used the serial, and everything installed without a hitch. I ran the program and it asks to activate online. 'No problem,' I think, I used a legit serial from a legit copy, I should be fine. What I didn't consider was that the activation server was taken offline (I'm sure the official reason was 'cost savings' but 'force people to upgrade' fits in there pretty well in my opinion).
So now I had a perfectly good box of software and a stack of manuals for a product I couldn't use for no technical reason other than the company didn't want me to use it. Damn, not even a decade of keeping their activation servers online by Autocad for their own software?
That is ridiculous, it'd be like Microsoft shutting down their infrastructure for Windows 7 activations today. I feel at a certain point, if you've sold software that calls home and you are unwilling to maintain the servers and there are still people using it, you should hand it off to the Internet Archive or a similar org so they can run it.
Leaving users stranded with no hope of using software they're familiar with, have paid for, and have supported is just a bad move. Moves like what Autocad did to you are why large companies are using libre software, if upstream dies for some reason, your business won't click off tomorrow. No, this isn't. If that was your worry you especially wouldn't use proprietary software where the issue is much more prevalent. As others point out, you could pay FOSS maintainers if you wanted to. Instead, people who don't use X make up excuses as to why not, rather than simply saying they like Y. If you like AutoCAD, use it.
In taking customer feedback it's important to only ask potential customers, not people who'd never use your product anyways. Even if their feedback is honest it won't help with what you're doing. Advanced tiff editor crack serial keygen download.
That sounds right, and your experience obviously gives you a negative experience of the manufacturer. But as an engineer in this situation I can relate. If we had phone-home activation I'd probably try to argue that it should be expiring re-enabled every year in the product so that if we abandoned it then users wouldn't be stranded. The question I'd have to answer is - would this be a net positive? Would it lead to more or less sales? Would we only lose customers who wouldn't buy a new license anyway?
What would the cost be of my proposed feature that helps customers in the future? In our situation there is zero risk of e.g. Losing business to open source, so management would likely be deligthted with the idea that users would not be running our old software. In reality we avoid the problem entirely by just selling subscriptions like so many others these days. The software has a kill switch that makes it unusable after the planned release date of version N+2. The managers of this hypothetical software company would surely complain if their cars were remotely disabled because the manufacturer wanted to sell a new model. Similarly their customers should complain (via the courts) when the product they bought is remotely disabled to force them to upgrade.